Whitehouse Healthcare Summit..No Republicans Allowed

 

There was a new spin as of yesterday in a Whitehouse summit on how to get government healthcare package sold to the public. The message will be Obama’s healthcare is great and it will put money in the pockets of families, but here is the problem.  Not one Republican was present for this meeting. The meeting was also a challenge to Democrats and of course one independent the Socialist Bernie Sanders to get this healthcare package in place as quickly as possible and work the details out later if necessary.  Note the language of the New York Times summary of report on the Whitehouse directives to Democrats. If you believe this plan will put $2,600. and up to $10,000. of new income to the average family of four, later, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. This is dishonest and ranks with snake oil sales tactics to make promises like this. This meeting was secret to Republicans because it was the sales meeting directives from Obama to Congress how to sell this foul package. Obama believes he can run automobile companies, sell cars, run banks, so why not, he is now a huckster for a lame bill for government run healthcare.  One day they talk of a duel system, the next a single payer system. To be sure, we will end up with a Canadian or UK type system that will be terrible if he has his way. This is an outrage. Republicans have no clue as to what is going on. Transparency right????

 

This announcement copied below was put out Tuesday, reports Wednesday morning have no elaboration other than to say the existing healthcare system is terrible and our lives are at stake???? Bernie Sanders is talking to any live microphone he can find saying that the Canadian or UK healthcare system is far superior to our existing system, but he adds that Democrats have even better news, the new healthcare system will put money in the pockets of the average citizen in the USA.  So this is clearly the shell game they are using, to give out outrageous statements about a better healthcare system for all with extra money in family budgets?  I have never imagined a more dishonest administration. The Obama people believe the American public as gullible and stupid.

 

Jim The Conservative

 

Top Democrats to attend White House meeting on health care

NAIC NewsWire | 06/02/2009

President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with top Democratic lawmakers this week to discuss health care reform options. The president will meet with the leaders of the Senate panels responsible for writing the health bill in order to urge them to move quickly in passing the legislation. Also this week, the White House released a report showing that Obama’s health care proposals would add $2,600 to the income of the average family of four by 2020, a figure set to increase to $10,000 by 2030. New York Times, The (06/01)

CAP AND TRADE ANOTHER OBAMA NIGHTMARE COMING OUR WAY

When ever the Obama administration talks new programs it most often translates into how he plans to put a dent in the ever expanding deficits he has created for every American family. This is particularly so in that Obama has indicated that half of the deficits will be paid back in his first four years. This is complete nonsense to suggest he can do this and we must focus like a laser on everything this man says from this point forward. He cannot be trusted and cap and trade is a perfect example. The trickle down cost to a typical family will be at or more than $3,000. per year in new energy costs. Obama will not pay back the deficit, we taxpayers will, and it will get worse because this is only one way the Obama administration will extract dollars out of your wallets.

Remember, when government develops and sells a new tax, and cap and trade is nothing more than a shell game, it is a new taxing method, the income derived will be spent, it will probably not go against the deficits, that is a pipe dream, as these schemes are developed by Obama’s spin masters to satisfy their spending plans.

The Republicans would do well to tie in the cap and trade to the plans that Obama has to reduce the deficits, and this is how they can either defeat or make the cap and trade so undesirable to Obama’s people that they abandon it totally. At the same time they must get the message out that new expenses will impact each family as a result of cap and trade taxes. The Republicans must call cap and trade a tax which is what it is.

How did this idea get started, and the answer is switch and bate by Democrats, and their issue is carbon emissions. If you talk to real scientists, you will learn that Carbon has been around for billions of years, it is not destructive, in fact carbon is the foundation of much of the basis of life, and we might even harm nature if we remove carbon by any meaningful amount. We cannot do that, so this is nothing but a myth generated by Al Gore who probably generates more carbon footprints in his jet and massive home in Tennessee than any 100 families in America combined. This save the earth stuff is creating opportunities for snake oil salesmen and that is what this is all about. It is good that Republicans are doing energy summits but they need to tie in the actual truth of what the carbon issue is all about. It is about taxing the day lights out of each American family.

Now this Whitehouse tax machine is adding into cap and trade carbon emissions “AND OTHER GREEHOUSE GASSES”. This is because the argument has been raised that carbon is not as evil as the Whitehouse experts have suggested. So you see, the tax machine (Obama Whitehouse) has had to expand the notion beyond carbon as insurance against declining scientific evidence that carbon is not that harmful. Other gasses give them insurance that they have some kind of reason to tax the living daylights out of each citizen of this country when the carbon issue dies. Unbelievable how these spin machines reinvent their missions and there are endless new crisis ideas they will create to continue this bait and switch machine.

Of course this is elementary, but carbon is being blamed for global warming, but the concept of global warming is under attack as a non-provable problem, as seen in the literature of recent. Cycles can explain the ebb and flow of warming and cooling over a wide demographic period, therefore we are looking at a cap and trade program that may not be needed. There is no science yet that says carbon is harmful to humans or the earth other than it is blamed for man’s recent claims of global warming. Now because that myth is being questioned, why move forward with a cap and trade program that most likely will prove to be nonsense also.

The cap and trade would cost jobs, lots and lots of jobs, 2.3 Million to be expected, but this is a conservative figure, it could be more like 3.5 to 5 Million jobs lost, and these are permanent losses according to The Charles River Associates report in the WSJ referenced article below.

All of the Cap and Trade has to be viewed in context of a continuing Kyoto Protocol decision yet to be made, that is the next bomb to drop on global warming, so the Democrats are not discussing the Kyoto issue now, that is laying in wait for another day, a massive negative issue that will raise up again after the Democrats either get the Cap and Trade passed or not, another way to insult the American family with needless cost and economic hardship if Kyoto is passed in this country. Kyoto is the vehicle of most of the survivors of the communistic rulers who have lost their positions in USSR and Kyoto types of groups are their new home to pillage the world of economic dollars and benefit with their own personal wealth.

Of course what the public is not being educated on is that the Obama administration has lied and is shutting down any chance of meaningful exploration, discovery and drilling for existing petroleum within our borders, which is utter stupidity, at a time when we could be looking for new energy sources, but keeping our economy moving forward at the same time while using existing petroleum resources effectively. The Obama spin masters are practicing massive government re-engineering of the American economic system to extract what they will say is the payback tax needed to continue their appetite for spending massively.

And now a new Democratic initiative to hit your wallets, Value Added Taxes, 25% on goods and services, a European type tax is now being considered by Obama, an additional tax because he has to come up with some way to pay for his Universal Health Care plus the massive debt load already on the books. This alone will be devastating to families, and it would be on top of cap and trade, and other taxes that are planned. A VAT tax is evil more so because it is a stealth tax not seen by the public, it is added onto the price of goods and services and does not show up in a sales slip. European counties have imposed a VAT tax for years, and the public in Europe has become accustomed to it, but that does not make it viable in the USA.

I will have a new posting on this evil VAT Tax plan next. We can only deal with a certain amount of bad news in a given day. I am exhausted just with what I covered in this posting, I cannot take any more today.

Common sense seems to be a forgotten commodity in Washington these days.

Jim The Conservative

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/how-much-will-cap-and-trade-cost/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655590609066021.html

http://nordhaus.econ.yale.edu/dice_mss_091107_public.pdf

Thomas Wigley, “The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and Climate Implications,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 25, No. 13 (1998), pp. 2285-2288.

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2009/05/27/National-sales-tax-debate-begins-to-stir/UPI-41781243442014/

Timely Article On Freedom of Speech

As an inkling of where the more conservative bunch are here is an article by David Limbaugh, yes the Brother of Rush, but a credible journalist appearing in many newspapers nationally and a lawyer of good reputation. I send this recent article to you to expose you to what a major body of American voters think, and my view is that there is much to be learned in this article. When I say the more conservative bunch, I am talking not only of Republicans, but inclusive and of a wider percentage of the American voters than you might consider at first, including many very recent converts to more conservative views as a result of what is going on in Washington in the last three months. There are signs of many people moving more to the conservative side of things, or at a minimum to a more right position recently due to perceptions that Obama and his inner circle are and have been administering well to the left of his voters. In other words many who voted for change were angry at President Bush, but are now realizing that their anger at Bush for what ever reason justified or not has resulted in a much more leftist world then they imagined when they entered the voting booth in November of 2008. Obama has used these prior more conservative votes to his advantage and not to the advantage of moderates and conservatives generally.

This real shift will cause a massive shift back more toward the center in the next few years and must be recognized. The Obama inner circle are awakening to this and will do nothing short of illegal, if not taking morally bankrupt actions to nullify the message to the center and right of the center political world. This will include the FCC Targeting Conservative Radio, as well as using our taxpayer monies to bailout the leftist media that has lost readership due to the apparent leftist message they have been spewing to the dismay of a majority of Americans. Electronic media (Radio and Television) has shown in the last few years, but more so in the last few months a remarkable increased listenership while liberal electronic and more importantly print media has taken a dramatic nose dive and this is worthy of significant finding in the eyes of the Pew Foundations for Public Opinion and many other reliable sources. Capitalism is under direct attack by the far left, and this shakes the foundations of many Americans who understand that Capitalism has made this country the most successful country on earth, and they don’t want that jeopardized in any way shape or manner, and the Obama administration is perceived to be throwing dirt upon the capitalist concept daily. The tide is turning very quickly and will be growing as a large force in the very near future. The newly awakened moderates and conservatives will activate more forcefully against the far left policies of the Obama administration because they see damage developing to the business world and thus the capitalist world, damage that must be stopped.

It is clear that we are now seeing a President that understands how to divide the political spectrum far better than President Clinton attempted to do, Barack is grounded in his entire shaping and development in the far left world from childhood through adulthood. Unlike Clinton, Obama really hates this country and what it stands for, and his ardent leftist popularity is evidence of that, and this assessment of Obama is beginning to be seen for all to see at this point. Many are beginning to see his mythology in stating his disinterest of the Fairness Doctrine, then out of the shining light of openness he exacts the policy he wants without public knowledge. He knows how to manipulate far better than typical politicians. He claims openness and transparency, but he has in reality shown contempt for these concepts. People are becoming afraid of the major shift from the free enterprise and capitalist heritage we have seen for our generation as a working and successful venture overall not to be judged on the basis of one five or ten year period of time. This hard time will pass, but do we really need to massively change our country as Obama is attempting to do? I think not.

Jim The Conservative

Newsmax
FCC Chief Targeting Conservative Radio
Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:13 AM
By: David Limbaugh Article Font Size

Of the dozens of reasons to be concerned about the ever-growing and unchecked power of the federal government under President Barack Obama, the upcoming assault against conservative talk radio may surpass them all.

It’s not enough that liberals dominate the executive and legislative branches, liberals are poised to control the judiciary, and, at liberals’ direction, government is absorbing ownership and control of large chunks of the private sector. They also must shut up the opposition.

We have genuine cause for alarm on multiple fronts — and actual alarm indeed exists among increasing numbers of people, not all of whom are predisposed to excitability.

The government has declared war on innocent life in the womb in the name of “free choice.” It is spending unconscionable amounts of money it doesn’t have and can’t possibly acquire without taxing the primary producers in this nation into abject servitude. It’s set to impose “cap and trade” taxes in the name of protecting an environmental threat that exists mostly in the data-resistant prisons of their ideological minds, which will yield no environmental benefit but will cause irreparable economic harm.

It has passed constitutionally repugnant and morally odious legislation, carving out new crimes for violent acts motivated by “hate” against certain protected groups. Neither military veterans nor conservative males are among the protected groups, but pedophiles very well may be.

The proscribed “hate” under the statute may not be “hate” at all, but mere political or theological disagreement with the view of the dominant media culture and the ruling class on, for example, the normalcy of homosexual behavior.

Meanwhile, this same ruling class and its enablers, who are so selectively indignant about certain majority opinions they mischaracterize as “hate,” openly bask in the kind of behavior no one can dispute rationally as hateful at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

The government, through President Obama, has trotted the globe, painting the United States, the most magnanimous nation in the history of the world, as an international pariah and disgrace for which he must presume to apologize.

The government would have prosecuted officials of the previous administration for conducting enhanced interrogation techniques they reasonably believed were legal (and the lawyers who furnished the legal opinions approving the techniques) until it discovered, with egg on its face, that in a recent case, an appellate court (and the Justice Department, in another) had endorsed the previous administration’s definition of torture.

The government threatens and intimidates creditors into transferring wealth to the administration’s friends in labor. It uses taxpayer money to fund nefarious enterprises, such as ACORN, to engage in widespread illegal activities designed to corrupt and skew the census, elections and other democratic processes as we watch, with mouths agape, seemingly powerless — for now — to stop it.

The government is a heartbeat away from nationalizing healthcare based on deliberate misinformation about the nation’s uninsured and despite the 100 percent failure rate of such fantastic reforms elsewhere on the globe.

This government has declared a false moral equivalence between the respective behaviors of democratic Israel and Palestinians committed to the extinction of Israel. It will attempt to force the Israelis to accept the twin suicidal concessions of relinquishing strategic real estate vital to its security and agreeing to the “return” of millions of Palestinian refugees. It appears to have abandoned any pretense of preventing Iran, a nation also committed to Israel’s extermination, from acquiring nuclear weapons while encouraging Israel, instead, to disarm.

But of all the unfolding outrages, I doubt any will ignite true patriots more than the imminent resurrection of the government’s war on conservative talk radio. If we can’t even express political dissent, the nation we’ve known as a bastion of individual liberty will be no more.

President Obama, in classic misdirection, has proclaimed that he will not support efforts to reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine, through which the government would silence conservative talkers in the name of achieving “balance.”

But he doesn’t have to support the Fairness Doctrine to accomplish the same sinister goal when Congress and the Federal Communications Commission will do his dirty work for him. WorldNetDaily reports that Michael J. Copps, acting FCC chairman, has denounced the lack of racial and gender diversity in the broadcast industry as “a shameful state of affairs.” Unsurprisingly, his proposed corrective is to force the transfer of station ownership to greater numbers of minorities, who are statistically more likely to carry liberal talk shows.

Let the record reflect emphatically that conservatives never have tried to use government to shut down the liberal media monopoly in network television and major newspapers, under the deceitful pretense of achieving balance or otherwise.

Let the record also acknowledge that, if this administration presses forward with this overreach, it finally might jolt the complacent among us out of their stubborn naiveté and apathy.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney.

A Universal Healthcare Sales Campaign Like We Have Never Seen Before is about to Blanket our Country

There is a huge sales campaign now in high gear getting the Obama Healthcare Plan approved and agreed upon. Health and Human Service Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is now saying that the existing unacceptable healthcare system is a disaster and must be changed to a new system immediately. No time to waste this has to be done as an emergency measure. She is saying that high healthcare costs are because those who do not have healthcare coverage are bankrupting the system and must be brought into the system to make a new system work. A conference report by Sebelius Tuesday of this week based upon a meeting Monday with the leaders of the healthcare system, is declaring her assessment correct that the healthcare system as it exists cannot assume offering services to the underclass now not covered, and therefore we need a complete overhaul and a national healthcare plan for all Americans now. She is suggesting that all attending this so called planning meeting in Washington agreed with that outcome. I seriously question that. Ever since Obama assumed office we have seen one emergency after another all blamed on of course George Bush that has to be resolved immediately. Crisis is the Obama’s way of getting things done. Declare an emergency and it gets attention without discussion, just gets done. Wonder why we still have no credit flowing from the banking system, or why the Social Security system is now failing, or why is Medicaid suddenly failing, but no action there? Hmm. I guess Medicare and Medicaid are going to be used for something bigger? Perhaps they will be the new healthcare plan for all of us. Hmm. Obama does not need to worry about fixing these agencies, he will build them up for the new universal care system. Ok, we take failed systems and make them bigger?

This is the dishonest strategic way they will sell this. Using comments from existing providers of health care insurance, in response to questions Sebelius presented, then in turn arriving at her own conclusion, and interjecting the notion of the group of health care executives agreeing with her findings. Of course the question to the existing providers was…. can you assume costs of the underclass and all persons not now covered? The resounding response was probably no, so that is that. Government now has all they need to begin and complete their plan for a new government run system with approval of the existing healthcare system providers, or at least Sebelius making it appear that way. The Obama administration through Secretary Sebelius will try to make it appear that all options were discussed, and the final conclusion was to move toward universal health care for all. This of course avoids transparency totally.

This is the same construct that has been used in many school and educational systems* for years, making assumptions based upon pre-planned questioning that predicts the only response desirable to make the policy choice desired. The use of outcome-based strategy as defined below works in many forms called behavior modification, or values clarification. This really has been borrowed now by governments to get policy enacted with the help of the public through the same kinds of predictive modeling with questions that lead to the desired answer to the posed question and thus policy needed. The details of what the policy will be is not offered or explained. It is perceived by government that they need not bother with those details, it would only confuse the general public. They cannot take the chance of another Hillary Clinton debacle when the Clinton administration mounted their effort on Universal Healthcare. You see, the Clinton administration was using transparency tactics, and that is what got them in trouble. In fact details are the very root of the problem that the Obama administration wants to avoid at all costs. The policy is then suggested based upon the input, in this case that of the of healthcare providers, in their responses to outcome based questions to arrive at a conclusion that may or may not be what the healthcare providers believe or would want to be party to. It is becoming dangerous for professional and executives to attend Washington conferences because you will never really know how your views might be utilized in the final report. Just ask many of the scientists who initially participated in the Al Gore climate change surveys and groups.

1*“Part of any theory of behavior modification, values clarification or outcome-based education involves the idea of “what do we want the future to be like?” To decide on how to modify values, beliefs, or behavior, one must first decide what “outcomes” they want to exist in the future, then what behaviors are necessary to bring the outcomes about, and finally what values, beliefs and convictions are necessary to enable or support these. All these “social engineers” first establish a very clear idea and model of what they want the future to be like, but you will have to fight against those who would happily make those decisions for you”. They have always been around sowing their mischief. They are here now. They are our Federal Government in the form of the Obama Administration who want Universal Health Care like those programs in Canada and elsewhere where they don’t live up to their stated expectations. *As any hospital near the Canadian border will attest, they do brisk business treating Canadians that cannot get approved of or have to wait for months or years for medical procedures in Canada, so they pay full price to get what they need in American hospitals so they can continue with their lives, or avoid perishing.
Source
Modern Education, Values Clarification, OBE, Behaviorism – The REAL Problems
by Gene Zimmer

2*http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/157/6/767.pdf

Jim The Conservative

States Becoming Dependent Upon Stimulus Funds

Many states are beginning to be dependent upon massive funds flowing from the Obama Stimulus bill and this will heal short term problems, but create long term problems in that the states using stimulus funds to balance state shortfalls, such as their Medicaid programs or educational programs without assurances that stimulus funds will be forthcoming in future years. The Obama administration seems to be looking the other way on this serious problem, and is letting the states put their budgets at risk perhaps saying to the states that the Federal government may be able to assume costs later in a few years down the road with new tax revenues generated by taxing the big corporations and the rich, yet to be identified Federal income sources like Cap and Trade, and new tax sources. Obama has said the results of his Stimulus bill will not be seen for a couple of years, leading states to believe the Federal budgets will be flush with money to continue state bailouts on a more permanent basis. This is suicide for states in out years if they buy into this garbage. Also it seems to fit into Obama’s theory of creating dependency then making demands upon the dependant states to perform according to Federal standards, rather than state standards, as is the case with the Banks and the Auto Companies. If you do a search on Google for states use of Stimulus bill monies, it is amazing how creative states are in expanding their future state mandates with one time stimulus funds. In a couple of years, if the Federal government does not replace these funds with new stimulus funding, the states will be vested in long term unfunded programs, then the pressure will be on states to cut their programs. Is there a purpose in mind by the Obama administration to create this dependency on purpose? I think there is. This does not encourage good management of state resources, and is a very significant problem now being created by the Obama administration. There may be a method to the madness, namely that Obama fueled expansion of dollars into these programs will have many strings attached to move his agenda forward.
Jim the Conservative

http://www.meridianstar.com/editorials/local_story_049003247.html

http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/articles/2009/04/12/news/local/doc49e0079e804a0206370222.txt

http://www.state.sd.us/news/showDoc.aspx?i=10578

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/politics/story/64920.html

http://blogs.thenewstribune.com/politics/2009/02/10/state_budget_writers_hope_u_s_house_stim

Etc, Etc.

Chrysler Fate on the Line, This is Pressure Time

The story this morning on April 30, 2009 is that Fiat and Chrysler are posturing to close a deal to have Chrysler go through a quick bankruptcy, to clean out the various problems, and possibly have Fiat take over the company, without Federal government interference, but the Feds are not happy with that, it is assumed because they don’t get the kind of control they got with GM. My feeling is that the Obama machine is holding out for control over the interests of Chrysler bond holders. Chrysler bond holders who will only do well if the company goes through quick bankruptcy and emerges either on their own, or with Fiat as owner bond holders having been given payout of one sort or another. It is my opinion that the union issue is driving the Feds with regard to these solutions. This may be coming down with private enterprise taking the initiatives away from the Feds, and this may bring pressure from Obama administration to fight the private deal making. We know the Feds want the union votes and will want to structure a deal to benefit the unions. That seems to be how the Obama machine functions, it looks for potential political standing with their constitutants in this case the unions. My view is that private enterprise should be the first choice in any options, and if this stalls, then the government can make their solutions available.

The mantle of the Obama administration may be in the lens of ethics on this deal having seen how the bond holders of GM were I believe fed to the fishes. Perhaps the Obama machine players are being one upped on this and it is about time. The continuing shabby operation of the takeover of industrial giants by the Obama administration could be ending with this move. By the end of today, we will probably see what this Obama team is made of. They may attempt to control the deal, and not let the private sector work this out. The question is will Obama interject the feds for the union votes, putting the bond holders at risk? This is clearly political and is a getting Democratic votes strategy for the Obama machine. Obama signals now are that they control the loans in TARP or bailouts, and this is their big stick used to force the deal they want. Is this how we want our Federal Government to be working? I doubt it strongly, but then we have President Obama who believes he is supreme and can do things no other President would dare to attempt because of his “CHANGE” mandate? When are the majority of Americans going to recognize how shabby this administration really is?

Jim the Conservative

Pontiac Line Ready for burial.

We are a Country that is changing as a result of Obamanomics and we will all be the lesser for it. With the closure of the Pontiac division we will see the end of a long history of stylish cars and the flashy dreams of many car owners in the future.

As a result of our President, now the controlling force of GM deciding to end both Pontiac, and possibly GMC divisions. Government does not seem to care that the profit centers of GM were these cars, and the truck lines and classy RVs…without these lines, GM probably will not be around much longer.

Nationalization of industries is appalling and this is the result to be expected. What most people don’t know is the cost of all of this nonsense to the American people will be astounding and fruitless. Same thing with the banking takeovers, this is complete lunacy. We await the next industry to be run from the Whitehouse by a man who is 47 years old who has never run anything in his life and is influenced chiefly by Sol Alinsky, the 50’s and 60’s revolutionary, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and of course his friend denied, William Ayers.

It is almost a game to read the newspapers or watch television each day to see what new odd ball concept in the Obama Change Express for the day brings to us like the leavings of what the cat brought to the back door step overnight. People who have owned an outside cat know what I mean. The three or four press conferences he holds each day is an exercise in frustration to see what he plans to do next that will harm the USA. I wish he would take a thee month vacation now, let everything settle so we can judge what works and what does not before he attempts to do anything else whatsoever. It might save us a couple of hundred billion dollars of new debt.

Jim the Conservative

The Fog of War and Now the Fog of Democrats; Memory of 9/11 Sure Dissipated.

Let’s see, the wartime procedures utilized that were approved and reviewed with leaders of both parties in Congress and that were answering the need to ward off further attacks upon our nation were approved. A new President is elected in 2008, and when assuming office in 2009 he decides to change the intelligence apparatus to not allow the procedures that were in place with the prior administration.

Now the new administration wants to declare war upon the prior administration for prior approved procedures that were legal when applied and carried out, but now are considered to be illegal by the current administration, hence the Democrats feel they are justified, having changed their minds, to now apply the new administration legal interpretations to the prior administration looking backwards. I am not a lawyer, and I am often proud to say that, but how can anyone with an ounce of sense believe the Democrats have a legitimate legal issue here? This fight currently going on is not warranted, and is a smoke screen to avoid the really important things that need the attention of Congress, namely the economic crisis, and just about everyone I relate to seems to agree with my feelings. The current administration is completely out of touch with where this country is and what the people really believe in.
Jim The Conservative

Who Are These People Who Are Running Our Country Anyway?

These people are different in the Obama Administration, very different than ever experienced before in the Whitehouse. They seem to have a passion to destroy anything or anyone who does not believe everything and anything they espouse or want to do.

They confound the typical structure between two political parties, in that they say you either follow us and our policies and legislation initiatives or you will be marginalized and unplugged from the process of legislation and decision making. If Republicans don’t vote in favor or even vote, as was the case for the last recovery initiative, then they are called obstructionists and the “NO PARTY”. They define the opposition and if the opposition does not respond they loose. If they do respond, it doesn’t matter they still loose.

They blame others while they do not accept others blaming them for anything whatsoever. They appear to be on a steam roller mentality of it is their way or else.

They appear to want to see all things bad if Republican or Conservative or Free Enterprise driven. That seems to sum up where they (Obama Administration) come from. It almost seems laughable at first, but then the mainstream media endorses these absurd and ridiculous notions.

If you apply developmental childhood concepts, this is a group of people that will throw tantrums if they do not get their way each and every time someone disagrees with their actions.

Jim The Conservative

GE Parent of NBC is Full Fledged Mouthpiece of Democratic Party

It is clear that NBC, CNBC MSNBC are mouthpieces for the Obama Administration without doubt. I caught a part of Ed, a program hosted by Ed Schultz a liberal host on radio as a new anchor for the 6pm to 7pm daily on MSNBC. I never heard such blatant support of one political party while bashing the Republicans in personal and hateful ways. This man is a total buffoon a complete jerk. He of course joins Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann all of which are in the tank for Obama, and a happy members of the Hate All Republicans Club.

http://www.kxmc.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=358750

This whole network can no longer claim it has any newsworthy credentials whatsoever. Their ratings are dropping lower by the week as a result, and their credibility has all but left them completely.

They are also being directed specifically by Jeffrey Immelt the President of GE, to be favorable to Democratic causes, pushing the far left liberal causes of course, and has this week directed that the Network push green policy wherever and whenever they get a chance, and to make certain that Republicans are painted as anti-green. Imelt has run GE as a major company into the ground, and yet continues to spew his hate and political polarizing venom. It is no wonder that President Obama has made him a personal advisor in his administration. Free network advertising anyone?

Jim the Conservative